It was inconsiderate to park, allegedly for a short time, on this corner but as it wasn't a contravention Mr Mustard fought the PCN. He doubtless also gave the driver some words of advice.
Barnet Council rejected both the informal challenge and the formal representations which wasn't very bright of them but doubtless the revenue imperative was running the show.
This led to Mr Mustard starting an Appeal to London Tribunals which means c. £30 in wasted fees by the council, who have to fund the independent tribunal mostly based upon their share of usage.
Mr Mustard decided to have a bit of fun and waxed lyrical in his Grounds of Appeal.
The council then proceeded to waste at least 2 hours of their agent's time (NSL) in getting them to produce the Evidence Pack for the tribunal. There was more nonsense within it:
'The CEO has a legal obligation to issue PCNs to any vehicle seen parked in contravention.'
Mr Mustard will let Captain Hastings of Poirot fame speak for him: 'What rot'.
(CEO = Civil enforcement officer a.k.a. Traffic Warden.)
The independent adjudicator was even-handed and thorough in her assessment of the evidence of both sides but there was only ever going to be one outcome, a cancelled PCN and so it turned out.
This is a classic example where Barnet Council claimed that black is white (there aren't even any shades of grey here). It was an abuse of power which should be punished but there is no mechanism to bring that about. If a council had to give £130 back for every unlawful PCN there would be more care taken.
Please don't pay PCNs which are patently wrong, you only encourage them.
The end
No comments:
Post a Comment
I now moderate comments in the light of the Delfi case. Due to the current high incidence of spam I have had to turn word verification on.