click to enlarge |
Dear Cllr Cornelius
I read with interest your letter in the Barnet Times of last week.
I am not a member of BAPS, although I do feature in the wraparound, and you are taking issue with its accuracy "given the extent of the inaccuracies and errors of the wraparound" which by extension, impugns my credibility.
I always strive for accuracy in what I write and if I dispute someone else's figures that is because I have a view as to what is accurate backed up by pieces of paper.
What I would therefore like to receive from you is a list of the alleged inaccuracies and errors so that I can study it. Simply saying that some unspecified figure is wrong is simply a political sound bite and I know how fond you are of sound bites Dr Evil.
One figure that you do seem to be taking issue with is the Billion Pound Gamble figure. You have carefully quoted only the expenditure figures in your letter. You are not telling the whole truth as the outsourcing contracts (if they ever get signed) will also concern the council's income.
I read with interest your letter in the Barnet Times of last week.
I am not a member of BAPS, although I do feature in the wraparound, and you are taking issue with its accuracy "given the extent of the inaccuracies and errors of the wraparound" which by extension, impugns my credibility.
I always strive for accuracy in what I write and if I dispute someone else's figures that is because I have a view as to what is accurate backed up by pieces of paper.
What I would therefore like to receive from you is a list of the alleged inaccuracies and errors so that I can study it. Simply saying that some unspecified figure is wrong is simply a political sound bite and I know how fond you are of sound bites Dr Evil.
One figure that you do seem to be taking issue with is the Billion Pound Gamble figure. You have carefully quoted only the expenditure figures in your letter. You are not telling the whole truth as the outsourcing contracts (if they ever get signed) will also concern the council's income.
Here are the figures from 2011
taken from the council's own reports (rounded to the nearest thousand to make
them easier to digest.) (readers - reports are below)
£ | DRS | NSCSO | Together |
Costs | 18,528,000 | 43,961,000 | 62,489,000 |
Income | 10,286,000 | 13,647,000 | 23,933,000 |
Combined | 28,814,000 | 57,608,000 | 86,422,000 |
Ten years | 288,140,000 | 576,080,000 | 864,220,000 |
15 years | 432,210,000 | 864,120,000 | 1,296,330,000 |
The items included in the One Barnet projects have changed
over time due to changes of scope and cuts to services and staffing. The figures
are in a constant state of flux. The range is from £522,000,000 for 10 years
using your expenditure only figures to £1,296,330,000 across 15 years for all
contracted items. Thus the roll off the tongue phrase "The Billion Pound Gamble"
seems fair to me to give residents a flavour of what is proposed. They haven't
exactly been told much by the council have they? A recent 1190 word scratch at
the surface in Barnet First is all that the general public, as opposed to the
public gallery, have had. One word for each million pounds. Not exactly shouting
about One Barnet from the rooftops.
A good job us bloggers and BAPS & others are here to
help spread the word for you.
Can I also whilst writing also point out an oversight in
the draft gambling policy, which says:
The licensing
authority has resolved not to license casinos, with immediate effect. Any
applications received will be returned with a notification that a ‘no-casino’
resolution is in place.
There is an unlicensed high-stakes casino in the borough.
It is called the Council Chamber and is located at Hendon Town Hall. I trust you
will close it down immediately.
I do look forward to hearing from you soon with the
disputed figures and your backup for them.
Yours sincerely
Mr Mustard
p.s. Please don't think that I am so sad that I spend my
time counting words in Barnet First. The word count was done
electronically.
DRS - June 2011 |
NSCSO - March 2011 |
No comments:
Post a Comment
I now moderate comments in the light of the Delfi case. Due to the current high incidence of spam I have had to turn word verification on.