Showing posts with label non-stick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-stick. Show all posts

10 October 2012

Londonist guest bloggette

Mr Mustard is very grateful to the comprehensive site about London, Londonist, for their permission to reproduce the above drawing of how London could be divided up and the introductory paragraph, viz:

London’s boroughs, it seems to us, are all wrong.

It isn’t their abilities to empty bins, tarmac roads or stage amusing performing arts festivals that bother us (at least, not on this occasion).

No, the problem is their size.

You can read the rest of the thought provoking article here, on this link  'full article on Londonist' 

Mr Mustard is also grateful to the friend who brought this to his attention and thought that the  region containing Barnet should be called Barr-enf-ey but Mr Mustard, being Mr Mustard, had his own idea and though it should be called BEn-Har (please don't write in and complain about the bad jokes). Mr Mustard also thought, and this was last week when the news of non-stick not sticking it out at Barnet and then going to Haringey would put him in number 1 spot for the job of the CEO of a triple sized borough.

That was of course before the people of Haringey, pretty fleet of foot down there, started a petition protesting about the appointment of non-stick which has to be confirmed by full council on 16 October. This is the link to the petition.

Mr Mustard has never heard of such a petition ever being started and he is not going to sign it because he does not live in Haringey (although he did in about 1978) and he rather thinks that Barnet would be improved by a better Chief Executive. Mr Mustard wonders if non-stick has actually handed in his written resignation and as arrangements have already been made to cover his work the idea of his going is pretty certain. Even if he hasn't actually signed a resignation letter no person of honour could stay now as they have signalled their intention to leave and so must leave if they are to have any credibility at all.

In case anyone is interested there are quite a few vacancies on Iona coming up.

Finally, would bloggers of Haringey please look through all the Barnet links on this site and get in touch if you want to know anything.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

13 January 2012

Nick Walkley's Friday Joke ( unintentional)

Mr Mustard is sorry if you knew about this already.


The phone at Mustard Mansions has been redhot with calls about the weekly executive message and outrage at the contents. Mr Mustard thinks it is an elaborate joke about squaring a circle.

The first paragraph has been omitted as it concerned a bereavement and bloggers are human beings too you know despite a certain Brian Coleman being unimpressed with our entitlement to Human Rights. Aah, but we also have Blogger Writes which are powerful.



From: First Team
Sent: 13 January 2012 13:49
To: AllStaff
Subject: Weekly message from the Chief Executive

Those of you who have attended one of my recent budget briefings will know that I am keen to emphasise the democratic accountability that working in local government brings ( except in Barnet obviously ). Whilst popular media (bloggers getting to you are they non-stick ?) often downplays or caricatures councillors (Mr Mustard does believe that Cllr John Hart was up in front of the standards committee for mimicking a Sri Lankan resident - now that was an unfortunate masterclass in caricature so Mr Mustard thinks that members are being portrayed as they deserve )  , those who work in government will know the contribution Members make to the local community (good, bad, or indifferent. Certainly the contribution of the Cabinet Member for the Environment, and his parking payment & price policy, to town centres is making itself felt by the reducing number of visitors).

Supporting democratic accountability requires a decision structure that I know many of you can find a bit cumbersome, slow and often downright confusing (there isn't any democratic accountability. The structure is simple. The Cabinet run everything and you don't make it into the cabinet unless you work their way.) That need not be the case and often the examples I see are down to poor planning and communication (plenty of that around - the poor planning is why so many DPRs are being produced after the event). However, I also recognise that, particularly if you are faced with producing a report for the first time, the process can seem daunting (surely when people join they are given training as part of the induction process in how to produce reports so that it isn't daunting and so they set off using best practice?).

To help us all in this area, Corporate Governance are going to be running surgeries every Wednesday to offer advice and guidance to all officers. The sessions run from 11am-12noon (see the intranet for venues), so whether you want an introduction to decision-making or help on a specific report, drop by (any chance that you could start using Plain English as Mr Mustard suggested 6 months and which both you and the "leader" agree was a good idea and putting all relevant facts into reports and not making stuff exempt when it really doesn't need to be).

Nick
 
Mr Mustard looks forward to next week's joke from the Chief Exec, or a substitute if he is too busy to bother.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

3 September 2011

A rubbish idea

This blog is intended to head off any thought that someone in Barnet Council might get to copy the stupid idea that has taken hold in Bury. Here is the article that appeared in the Guardian

1. Bury council has defended its decision to spend £9,000 on iPads for its fleet of refuse trucks, saying the devices will allow it to provide a real time bin collection service.

2. The council has come under severe criticism for purchasing 22 of the touchscreen devices, which retail at around £400 each, just months after unveiling plans to make £12m of cuts to local services.

3. But they insisted the products, made by Apple, could produce significant savings by helping to reduce the number of bins missed by trucks and therefore the number of trips made by the vehicles.

4. The council, which collects rubbish from 83,000 houses each week, revealed that there were 4,228 reports of missed bins last year. Costing £40 each to revisit, it spent around £170,000 going back to empty bins missed on rounds.

5. A council spokeswoman said: "For a modest investment of £9,000, this technology should save us many thousands of pounds, provide residents with a better service, and promote recycling.

6. "We know how much residents value a responsive and reliable bin collection service. This system should ensure that the number of missed collections is reduced to an absolute minimum, because any problems are reported in real time to our customer contact centre.

7. "The system should also allow us to respond more quickly during the winter to any enforced changes in the collection route."

8. The council also said the soaring landfill costs contributed to the decision.

9. The spokeswoman added: "We need to urgently improve our recycling rates to avoid passing on crippling landfill taxes to local residents, which is already costing every local taxpayer £134 a year each and is set to rise to £250 a year if we keep dumping waste in landfill sites.

10. "This new technology will help us to log and monitor this, and help us in our ongoing efforts to promote recycling across the borough. It is absolutely vital that we increase recycling and reduce the amount of waste we send to landfill."

This article was originally published at Guardian Government Computing.


Mr Mustard has the following comments, using the above line numbers.

1. The iPad is not the default choice. All touchscreen devices should have been considered and the most rugged, waterproof, rubbish-proof system should have been selected if the purchase really can be justified..

2. This is the sort of purchase Barnet Council would make when in a financial mess. Don't do it Barnet.

3. The device will not prevent the binmen deciding not to empty a bin that is not placed near enough to the boundary or getting distracted and forgetting it and it won't help the binmen put empty bins back at the correct property.

4. This is the typical cost escalation scare tactic that councils employ. Let us work it out. 4,288 missed bins across 250 working days is 17 bins a day. If you employed one man with a van to collect all of these you are looking at say £15,000 for the man and £10,000 for the van which makes £25,000 a year for a nice cushy job. Cost per bin missed is £25,000 divided by 4288 = less than £6 per bin.

5. There are other ways to tackle this problem. Put the crew on a performance bonus with a target for each year of reducing the missed collections then they might just stop.

6. Problems aren't reported in real time. They come home from work to find their bin is still full and then report it after the binmen have gone home and tomorrow they are on a different round. As it happens Mr Mustard reported a green bin non-collection last Saturday and Barnet Council did not come back to empty it; they just left it until the following week. Doubtless in 10 days time Mr Mustard will get a response from Barnet Council as to their proposed solution.

7. How? Can the iPad drive a dustcart? What arrant nonsense.

8. No it didn't. As long as the recycling is collected the following week the same amount will be recycled.

9. The only way that buying iPads will improve your recycling rates is when you recycle the packaging.

10. The iPads will not tell you what materials and how much of each and even if it does that does not tell you what the householder should have recycled. Mr Mustard does not drink fizzy drinks and buys his beer in bottles so there is hardly ever any aluminium cans in his recycling. Mr Mustard does not buy a daily newspaper so there isn't much of that to recycle. Mr Mustard tries to cook from fresh so not many prepared food packets to recycle etc. He may look like he only recycles a modest amount but that is all he generates. 

Recycling is a huge and complex problem and the consumer throwaway society must take the lion's share of the blame. Sticking an iPad in the cab will enable the crew to find out the winner of the 2.30, it will distract the driver of a very dangerous vehicle from keeping his eye on the road and will make no difference to the volume of recycling or to costs.

Don't even think about suggesting this idea Barnet.

What you need to work out is how to get every household to maximise its recycling. That needs a sea change in attitude and it needs to be brought about by the carrot and not the stick.

20 June 2011

Non-stick Nick speaks.

Each week the employees at Barnet Council wait with bated breath for the weekly missive from their Chief Executive ( please do not believe everything that you read on this blog ) telling them how fantastic things are in Barnet, even if they aren't.

For the last 2 weeks Mr Traversty has sent this missive at the probable cost of about £20 a word ( actually I am not even sure the management actually write them - there is probably a ghost writer hiding at NLBP somewhere, in the Speech Preparation Internalisation Network unit , or SPIN-u for short ) and at the end of last week's message he wrote :-

"We will announce plans next week on just how we propose to do this"

So here is this week's message, from non-stick Nick himself, fresh from his uncomfortable appearance in front of the Audit Committee, where he looked as hot and sweaty as a frying pan full of melted butter, ( watch out for the fire non-stick as the Barnet Bloggers are not about to turn the gas down low ) :-

Last night's Audit Committee meeting was, quite rightly, amongst the most difficult in my time as Chief Executive.

Alongside the Metpro report, which was dealt with in last week’s email, I attended to specifically respond to the Internal Audit Annual Report. This, like the Metpro Report, pulled no punches but is rather more important in the conclusions it draws about aspects of the council's work. Overall it gives only "limited assurance" that we have the right controls in place to ensure that we spend wisely and meet the objectives we set.

As I confirmed to the Committee its vital that we have the robust internal challenge that audit provides and for too long I do not think that has been the case. However equally important is that when we identify concerns we learn from the findings and act on them.

Members have an absolute right to expect that when we get things wrong we prioritise putting them right. Last night I committed us to addressing all of the issues raised by the Internal Audit Annual Report.

On procurement this means a rapid programme of activity that will involve many staff across the council. An action plan is in place and procurement leads across the council are being briefed.

Much media focus has been on "who is to blame" and "who is going to carry the can?". However my firm belief is that now is the time for all of us to ensure that the contractual arrangements and suppliers we depend on are documented, monitored and in place and where they are not take action to tackle this. There will be more about this process in First Team but now is the time to make sure any suppliers you use have been through the right process. Moreover if you are concerned about an issue or your own knowledge/skills in this area - speak up. This is a time to put things right and not simply point fingers.

A second strong theme in the report is our management of information. We have made really good progress on Data Protection over the last year but there are still instances of paper records in particular leaving the offices unnecessarily. Keeping adequate control is not just about the right system but also that everyone follows those systems and procedures. Across the council, information management and contract management are matters that the vast majority of us have a roll to play in.

Its an oddity of the role of Chief Executive that I find myself congratulating the Assistant Director for internal audit Maryellen Salter on the quality of her work whilst then having to challenge myself and the rest of the council to rise to the challenges that work gives us. But as custodians of public money that is exactly how it should be.

Nick

Now I expect that you have already been to the sites of other Barnet Bloggers today:-

Rocketing Roger Tichborne was first out of the traps 
Click here
and Mrs Angry of Broken Barnet was as witty & withering as usual
Click here
 
Now, this roll that you have to play non-stick Nick; would that be a cheese roll or a management role ? Oh dear.

So moving to more serious matters which the employees need to know about as they certainly won't have got the full picture from the Chief Exec's message:-

So last week Traversty said that plans would be announced and Mr Mustard was looking forward to reading them. Now non-stick Nick blithely says that "plans are in place". Oh what short memories you think we have. Please publish the plan or a Freedom of Information request will have to be made for it.

You forget to tell your staff what "Limited Assurance" means. Unless one read the definition one might think that it was almost OK. An Audit with Limited Assurance means :-
"Weaknesses in the system of internal controls are such as to put the client’s objectives at risk. The level of non-compliance puts the system objectives at risk."

i.e. the systems are pants ! and anything could be happening, as it was in the case of MetPro.
It also means management have not been doing their job, at every level, up to and including the Chief Executive.

Also, as well as paperwork going out of the building, non-stick Nick forgot to mention that Treasury were taking unencrypted laptops home that contained all of the bank details of the Council. Oh dear again, a complete data protection disaster, but evidently not worth a mention.

A good job I mentioned it then.
Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

keyword : Nick Walkley