Showing posts with label not open. Show all posts
Showing posts with label not open. Show all posts

5 December 2011

I'm sorry I haven't a clue - a Radio 4 panel game (featuring Robert Rams)

Mr Mustard is a great admirer of the Radio 4 panel game "I'm sorry I haven't a clue". Sadly the same can't be said of his appreciation of Councillor Robert Rams.

This is what Rams wrote in his blog on 1 December:

"Barnet has nothing to hide, so I’m very keen that we make as much information about the council as easy to access as possible and the new website is the ideal vehicle to deliver on this transparency agenda"
 
Let us see if this is true. First up, in response to a Freedom of Information request, a page of Barnet Council's recycling services contract with May Gurney:
 
click to enlarge, or turn your screen off for the same effect!
and then Mr Mustard asked another London council that he knew used May Gurney, which turned out to be Hackney

look at all that lovely detail
so full marks to Hackney Council who sent Mr Mustard the complete unexpurgated contract quite quickly.

Barnet Council, on the other hand, sent part of the contract with lots of crossings out ( the technical word used is "redactions" ) and then on review ( which is a sort of appeal ) sent more schedules which had been missing from the first reply and undid a few of the crossings out. Not enough to make sense of anything though.

So there you have it Robert, absolute proof that Barnet Council are not open and transparent.

Mr Mustard was about to call at the office of the Information Commissioner (again) where he is always made welcome and so far has always been supported to ask that the entire contract be supplied without any use of felt tipped pen. Arguing the toss will cause a lot of work for the Freedom of Information officers ( work which I know Robert that you are keen to avoid ) so if you trip down the corridor to the Governance office ( or email or telephone them ) and ask one of the friendly officers there to send Mr Mustard the entire unadulterated May Gurney recycling contract in the post then we will both have achieved our objectives ( and Mr Mustard will say on this blog what a good job you have done - he might even add something friendly on yours ).

Yours openly

Mr Mustard

2 December 2011

Friday Joke - The latest Robert Rams blog

Rams, of course, is deadly serious, and the real bloggers were helpless with laughter when they read the latest utterings. Mr Mustard knows that he warned you not to read the ridiculous ramblings of Rams but will now break his own advice and re-print them here with the added musings of Mr Mustard in red.

I’ve just seen the latest version of the draft design templates for the new Barnet website and I’m very pleased with how the site is developing. This would be the well overdue website then would it? You may be pleased but what will be more important is whether residents will be pleased. You didn't mention the cost.

I’m confident that the new website will be easier to use and simpler to navigate than the existing site as the new design is cleaner and the content has been structured in a more straightforward manner. The designs are currently still in draft form but I will share them once they have been fully signed off and approved. We will see whether it is easier in due course. You should beta test this on the market with the biggest users of the website if you want to really know how it performs and avoid serious rewriting.

One of the main reasons for redeveloping the website is to make online transactions easier to access and simpler to use. The focus on bringing transactions online is a reflection of the changing way residents access both public and private sector services. The main reason is the council think it will be cheaper for them to make everyone use the internet. If this ends up with another fiasco like the cashless parking I wouldn't plan to be a councillor any longer than the next election in 2014. Some residents will want to do everything on-line but many won't so there had better be some choice.

It wasn’t that long ago that banking transactions had to take place before 3.30pm on a Friday but nowadays I can do my banking 24 hours a day, on the move or at home and I’m able to use a device that simply didn’t exist two years ago. On-line and telephone banking are available but are susceptible to fraud, especially telephone banking.

We can provide a better, more efficient service for residents by allowing them to access more services online, at their convenience. Only some services and only some residents. Remember, not everyone has access to the internet at home or the skill or the inclination to use it.

But as well as providing a more efficient transactional website, the redevelopment of Barnet Online will allow the council to focus on becoming more open and transparent. Now this was the point at which Mr Mustard started to lose it, he started to laugh and it was a long time before he stopped. All the council are focused on is how they can save money, what services they can chop, which libraries to close, where they can build as many extra properties as possible, which museums they can close and flog off etc etc. Ask yourself this question, how many meetings have there been to discuss openness and transparency? There has been one to allow filming several months after the infamous MetPro bullyboy council meeting and after central government had said to allow it. 
Ask yourself also how many exempt reports are there at council meetings, how often do the public get excluded. All the time.
Did the council try to stop filming at the Tambourides standards committee. Yes they did and they failed. 
Does the council delay or refuse to answer Freedom of Information requests on matters which really ought to be public knowledge; yest they do.
Are the over £500 lists complete and accurate. No. Where are the £1,000 a day payments to Halliford Associates Ltd for the services of Andrew Travers, the Chief Financial Officer in these lists. Nowhere to be seen in this financial year.
Are there meetings about One Barnet to which even councillors are not invited? Yes there are ( this is being reviewed this month )
Does Mr Mustard think he will be going to 2012 to meetings of an Openness and Transparency Committee. Of course not.

Barnet Council simply cannot be described as Open or Transparent and nothing will change until something happens at the top..


As has been discussed elsewhere, the council receives a large number of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and responding to them takes up a lot of officer time, time that would be better spent on the core activities of their jobs. We can greatly reduce this burden on council time and resources by publishing more council data and making it easier to find. Every council receives these questions. The law says that councils must answer them. What is the core activity of a Freedom of Information Officer? Stone the crows - it is answering Freedom of Information requests. What does Rams think it is? If the council is so committed to Openness and Transparency then they should write it into everyone's job descriptions. 

We may also encourage more residents to actively engage with the council. At the moment, being an armchair auditor requires a dogged determination. There aren’t many people who would want to spend their social hours trolling through committee papers and expense reports looking for anomalies. Roll up, roll up. More bloggers needed in Barnet. Plenty of room on the bus for more. As Barnet Council hack off more people with their idiotic behaviour more bloggers will just appear. Bloggers don't go looking for anomalies; we fall over them; was MetPro not having a contract and being paid £1.4m one of the anomalies you were thinking about?

By making more information – previous FOI requests, details of allowances and expenses, copies of contract and tender documents, committee minutes and decisions, performance data etc – more freely available we will allow those residents with less free time to find out more about how the council, councillors and council run services are performing.
Now would those contracts that you plan to publish, well the ones that you have managed to get in place so far, several hundred were missing at the last public count, will they be the heavily redacted versions that are currently issued or will they be 100% complete?

And contrary to what you might have read elsewhere, council services are performing extremely well:
81 per cent of resident are ‘most happy’ with refuse collection If 19% of Mr Mustard's customers were unhappy he would have gone out of business years ago ( he is in year 25 ). There are over 300,000 residents in Barnet. 57,000 of them are unhappy. Oh dear.
73 per cent of residents with experience of secondary schools describe them as ‘good or excellent’ and 27% don't. There are 27,000 children in primary schools alone of whom over 7,000 are not satisfied. Never mind the secondary schools where the numbers are larger. 
Adult Social Services are rated as ‘excellent’ by the Care Quality Commission. Would that be why there was legionella in 3 care homes recently?
Children’s Services are rated as ‘excellent’ by Ofsted. With the caveat that Ofset said there is room for improvement in children's home and childminder settings.

..and in many ways these are the key services residents care about. Not parking, or use of unlicensed security guards, or libraries closing, or museums closing, or being unable to ask policy questions at residents forums, or parks losing their assigned keepers, or the Pinkham Way proposed depot....?

Barnet has nothing to hide, so I’m very keen that we make as much information about the council as easy to access as possible and the new website is the ideal vehicle to deliver on this transparency agenda. So allow any question whatsoever at Residents Forums and don't duck Mr Reasonable's questions at committee meetings "What are you afraid of" was what he felt compelled to ask recently. You also need to stop a certain Cabinet member from saying he won't answer emails that are from residents outside of Totteridge. If you are on the Cabinet you are answerable to all residents.

In the New Year we will be looking at how we can better present performance data in ways that is genuinely helpful to residents. If anyone has an opinion on how information should be presented, I’d be interested in hearing your views. Don't you already have enough consultants working on this website.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

Subscribe to Keeping track of spending at Barnet Council by Email

16 November 2011

The One Barnet Partnership Board

Rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb
( Picture credit : herbalremedies )

One Barnet is probably the most fundamental and far-reaching change programme ever undertaken in Barnet. Probably only 1% of the residents of Barnet, who are funding it, have heard of it. There has been no meaningful consultation and no presentation of it by the Leader of the council. It is being progressed as quietly as possible and yet it might mean that hundreds of jobs could leave Barnet and end up in Bangalore ( Mr Mustard has nothing against Bangalore - it's just a name that goes well with Barnet and lots of jobs are out-sourced to India ).

Update 08:21 - someone has landed on this blog from Tamil Nadu in India, only 200 miles from Bangalore, after searching for 
"daniel seal + assistant cabinet member  + barnet" 
so maybe there have been some enquiries in India.
Firstly you need to understand the management structure of One Barnet ( if you do, please let everyone at the council know what it is ! )

click to enlarge; back to return


So here are the minutes of the March 2011 meeting of the One Barnet Partnership Board which according to Robert Rams' blog meets every 2 or 3 months ( I won't give you a link - if you really want to look at his blog you will have to find it yourself - it really isn't advisable ).





Was this a really productive use of so many people's time ?

Why has this board not met since March 2011 ?

Why were the minutes secret until March ?

Why are all Councillors not invited to attend if they so wish ?

Mr Mustard sent in the following questions under the Freedom of Information legislation.



Dear Sirs

I see from Cllr Rams's (sic) blog that the OBPB meets every 2 or 3 months.

The latest minutes on the council website are from March 2011.

Has the OBPB met since then please?

If it has please send me a copy of the minutes now that they are a public document.

If the OBPB has not met since March 2011 what is the date of the next meeting please?

I have struggled through much of the Constitution without finding the rules for the conduct of the OBPB. Please can you point me at the correct section of the constitution or website page.

Are the meetings open to the public & if not, why not?

Are the meetings open to all councillors?

Thank you for your assistance

Yours sincerely



and here is the reply

1. The OBPB has not met since March 2011. There are no scheduled future dates at the moment. Partnership arrangements are currently under review and the cabinet Forward Plan includes an item scheduled for the 14 December 2011 Cabinet ; Committee Papers.

2. The OBPB is the current name of Barnet's Local Strategic Partnership (LSP). ( would you have worked that out; Mr Mustard would not have ) Article 10 of the Constitution includes information on the LSP.

3. Government guidance on LSPs and their constitutional status (Here at the Communities department) does not specify whether meetings should be open to the public. The meetings are not at present open to the public, nor to all Councillors, unless specifically invited. However it was agreed in January 2011 that minutes should be published. ( Mr Mustard keeps hearing how "Open and Transparent" Barnet Council are. If that truly is the case these meetings should be open to the all councillors and the public. Secret meetings are bad. )
Mr Mustard believes in simple management structures. This looks like one layer that could be removed without any ill effect.  After all, it has done nothing for 8 months. 
Yours frugally
Mr Mustard