Showing posts with label future shape. Show all posts
Showing posts with label future shape. Show all posts

10 November 2011

More history - Future Shape - 21 October 2009

Carrying on with the history of Future Shape we go back in time to 21 October 2009. You can download the full report from council here, or look at it in the box below ( downloading and printing out is probably easier - 36 pages, item 8 )
Item 8 Future Shape 21 October 2009

Some items are worthy of bringing to your attention.

Page 74, item 3.1.

"Efficiency has always been important to us but when there is even less to go around we have to squeeze all the value we can out of taxpayers' money."

See this story; not much sign of value there?

"Delivery high quality public services in the borough is only possible through partnership between Barnet citizens and the wider public sector" Mr Mustard estimates that 99% of citizens have never heard of One Barnet. It was Mr Mustard who added the emphasis to the word "only". If that statement was true then no council in the country would directly supply any services whatsoever.

P77. Para 6.3 - The Council has signed up in principle to the Code of Practice on Workforce Matters. This was withdrawn by the Government for new contracts from 23 March 2011, see here.

P85. A review by PwC found that 1% of the workforce was directly involved in strategy and another 5% was involved in strategy related tasks. Surely we don't need 6% of the workforce, that is 204 people ( at 31 March 2009 there were 3,491 employees ), to navel gaze? Most services stay the same from one year to the next. There is no great need for fancy strategies.

If we then look at the little table, then we can see that these 204 people use 284 different pieces of software ( it is possible that there is overlap and that actually there are only 96 applications - the real answer is somewhere between the two ). The strategy people evidently didn't have any strategy!

P89. Another 193 people, or 5.8% of staff are engaged on ascertaining people's eligibility for support, and this is comparatively low. This, according to PwC could be improved. Mr Mustard doesn't suppose that this report was why 50+ temps were lobbed into Revenues and Benefits earlier this year.

P93. Para 4.2.

To address the issues identified above, our proposal is to establish a new citizen centric approach to commissioning for the borough, which uses design principles to develop a completely different system. What a load of tosh. Councils exist purely to serve citizens. Everything should always have been designed around citizens. Mr Mustard does not believe for one moment that citizens want fancy systems that revolve around them, they just want each separate service to happen on time. They were almost certainly happy with the system as it was, without spending millions on consultants.

P95 ( number missing at the foot of the page ) - It is therefore proposed that core to a new approach would be the creation of new roles akin to a "life coach". The life coach idea has been prototyped ( Mr Mustard thinks that means a test run ) at the start of this year, at great expense, and we have yet to see it come to fruition ( Mr Mustard knows of someone who would benefit but they will have to be patient - whilst their life is in tatters ).

P99 para 5.2 - It is proposed that access functions ( what the heck are they? ) are consolidated into a single customer service organisation (CSO). So there is another project that has been going for 2 years without really getting anywhere.

P100. Conclusions.

In the paper in July 2009 the Council stated that it had moved away from painting the picture of what the organisation of the future will look like. This paper therefore started from the premise that in order to meet the challenges facing the Council a new relationship with citizens is needed ( a false premise ). This new relationship is required ( no it isn't, it is but one choice ) if we are to protect universal services in the context of significant reductions in public spending. ( The last meeting Mr Mustard was at spoke of not providing universal services in the "Youth Offer" but targeting them, a change of plan then! )

To a degree this will be shaped by our determination to open up the structures, strategies and services of the Council and its partners so that they can be co-created by citizens ( but not provided by the in-house teams that are not allowed to bid ). This paper contains proposals to do that, but it does so in an environment where resources will be substantially reduced, and where we will not be able to give people everything they want. ( Think libraries, museums, youth centres, playing fields, leisure facilities, etc )

P103 Future Shape Programme Board - Now One Barnet Programme Board

The specific role of the Programme Board will be to monitor progress of the overall programme, quality assure high level strategic deliverables, review business cases from the workstreams as they are developed and review and monitor business risks. It is really odd that the Board has not met since March 11 and does not have a date set for the next meeting. A rudderless ship?

P104 Citizens or Customers?

Citizen   Advisory    Groups

The Future Shape Programme impacts a range of people and deals with often complex and competing sets of interests. Deliberative forms of consultation with citizens will be used throughout the implementation phase to help inform decisions. Such consultation will be in the form of Citizen Advisory Groups which will be drawn from service users and the Council’s Citizens Panel. The purpose of these small groups, which will consist of between 12 and 20 individuals, will be to work through proposals arising from the five workstreams, offer advice and make recommendations on the best way forward. ( which will be ignored if they don't suit, or might contain people who have never used the service in question )

Customer Forum


The new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) technology will allow the programme to identify those citizens who have contacted the council about a particular service and seek their views on any proposed options for services that are being considered. This Customer Forum approach will use online polling and discussion forums to elicit citizens’ views. ( Go on them, ask Mr Mustard about any service he has used; like that special one of the SIRT team where you get reported to the Information Commissioner for not having a Data Protection Licence that you don't need. )
Citizens Panel

The Citizens Panel for Barnet was set up in 1997 and is comprised of approximately 1,250 Barnet residents, selected to be representative of the adult population of the borough. It is regularly used by the Council and on occasion its partners, for one-off quantitative surveys and qualitative research such as deliberative conferences and focus groups and to track changes in residents’ attitudes to particular issues over time.


As part of the Future Shape Programme there will be a major refresh of the citizen’s panel and its membership so that it can be used for routine and rapid polling and testing new approaches to service delivery.
( Which panel was it Mrs Angry that you mysteriously fell off ? )

New councillors, or old ones. Please read this Future Shape report and send Mr Mustard a postcard telling him in 100 words what the devil One Barnet is all about ( think of it as an elevator pitch ).

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard 

28 October 2011

Future Shape 6 July 2009

Last month Mr Mustard promised to bring you the next instalment of Future Shape in order to help you understand the history behind OneBarnet.

The report seen by Cabinet on 6 July 2009 is available in full here on the council website and below in the box

6 July 09 Future Shape Complete

So this was the first report about the second phase ( commission; phase 1 was Consolidate ). Nick Walkley was already the Chief Executive and BT's Max Wide was putting his oar in; didn't he go off to help Suffolk which has just decided they don't want to outsource?

The whole of page 2 is simply marvellous. Read it twice and you still can't be sure what is planned.

Page 5 shows savings of between £8m and £16m, rather a worryingly wide variance don't you think?

Page 6 talks about Revenues & benefits - a department which the council want to shoehorn into their call centre which is one of their most stupid decisions. Council tax benefits are some of the most complex questions and simply cannot be properly handled in a call centre.

Also on this page a reference to problems for the pension fund due to workforce reductions. Council management seem to have forgotten this warning.

On to page 13. A new relationship with citizens. The person who types this report didn't understand how numbering works in their software. Mr Mustard advises turning off automatic anything in microsoft products. He directs your attention to para 2.2/3/1 ? In which citizens will have a much greater involvement in designing services and actively participating in improving their lives and contributing to a better Barnet. Mr Mustard does not remember being properly consulted about school crossing patrols, old people's wardens, CPZs or OneBarnet.

Page 24 includes the phrase about potential savings "The estimates are based on high level analysis and have not yet been validated at this stage" which is still the case today.

Paragraph 4.1.4 on page 25 could double up as the Friday joke.

Page 35 sets out 5 very good reasons why Customer Services should remain in-house. They are worth another read by management.

Pages 57 & 58 - risk upon risk but Barnet Council blindly plough on. Who is the driving force for OneBarnet - it's hard to say. When it all finally hits the buffers every councillor and every officer will deny it was them.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

5 September 2011

A history lesson - Back to the Future

Mr Mustard was not bothered about Barnet Council in 2008 and so he decided to read up about Future Shape - the forerunner of One Barnet. 

Cabinet agreed the establishment of the Future Shape of the Organisation programme at its meeting on 6 May (2008)

This blog takes as its base the report presented to Cabinet on 3 December 2008 and roughly half of the councillors who were at that meeting are still councillors. If you want to read the whole report you will find it here.
Summary:
The report proposes a model for the Council and its partners that will enable them to work more closely and effectively to respond to the needs and aspirations of people in Barnet and to translate these into priority outcomes, the delivery of which will significantly improve the quality of citizens’ lives and their experience of public service in the borough.
It is Mr Mustard who underlined and made bold the phrase "significantly improve". Mr Mustard has lived in Chipping Barnet for 15 years and worked there for 24 and he must have been preoccupied because he has not noticed that the borough has significantly improved in that time. If any councillors are reading, especially any from the drinks cabinet, would you please email mrmustard@zoho.com and tell him what significant improvements he has failed to spot since 2008.
Officer contributors:
Richard Grice, Future Shape Programme Director
Jenny Coombs, Transforming Service Delivery Director
Max Wide, Executive Director, Organisational Development
Claire Johnston, Programme Manager
Clive Medlam, Director of Resources
Jeff Lustig, Director of Corporate Governance

Half of these people are still at the council; perhaps no-one else wants them? 

Looking at Jenny Coombs's profile on LinkedIn her claims include: 
"Introducing and embedding a customer ethic". 
Mr Mustard thinks they have forgotten Jenny what you taught them at Barnet Council.

Finance: Cabinet are recommended to approve the use of balances to meet the one-off cost of £250,000 from December 2008 to June 2009.
Mr Mustard misses Future Shape. Only £1m p.a. Cheap at half the price. The bastard son of Future Shape, One Barnet, is a needy little sucker.

Property: Working with both commercial and strategic partners will have an impact on our office accommodation requirements. It is likely that benefits will be realised across the estate of the Council and its strategic partners, but until further work is done with partners as part of the next phase of the programme it is not possible to estimate the exact impact. It is clear though that the Future Shape and Accommodation Programmes will have to work closely together in order to ensure timescales match and to maximise benefits for the borough. Someone has forgotten this as part of the deal for outsourcing includes giving some of the offices on North London Business Park away rent free for a year or two. The first rule of negotiation - don't give anything away for nothing.
Performance and value for money: A business case will be developed for each specific change proposed to both the Council and the delivery of its services, with the recommended option being that which offers value for money for the Council and Barnet’s citizens and customers. Risk to performance will be considered as part of all business cases. Has anyone seen a business case proposal that wasn't simply getting a private company to carry out the service?
It is not therefore the aim of the Future Shape programme to simply outsource the services that are currently provided. Doing this will not lead to savings at the required level, nor to the improvements in the ability of services to deliver better outcomes. The capacity that the programme aims to develop is to be able to reconfigure public services so that they fit the lives of residents, and can continue to adapt to the changing needs of people in Barnet.
Oh yes it is! Outsource almost everything.
The model below illustrates in crude terms, the current, silo based approach to service delivery.

click to enlarge: back to return
Mr Mustard thinks that the silo approach makes sense. Do what you are good at, its called specialisation.
The model has served the Council well but is approaching the end of its useful life in terms of its ability to deliver the services people need and to produce savings.
No evidence was produced for the above statement.

Taking the idea of a strategic Council, a capacity vehicle and a different approach to service provision produces a model that may look like this: but there again it may not!
what a pretty chart; what does it mean?
This model has a sound theoretical basis. It builds on the approach taken to develop shared services across the Council to date and borrows from successful innovations developed in the UK, Canada and Australia. However it is unproven at this scale. The intention therefore is to work with our advisers and to engage the private sector in thinking through the feasibility of this approach and in estimating the level of savings and the kinds of improvement such an approach might deliver. We propose to report back on this work in June 2009. A sound theoretical basis but what about the practical?

9.9 Proposals for next phase of development

9.9.1 The proposal is to bring forward to Cabinet in June a detailed set of proposals for the model set out above. This should include specific analysis of:

• The benefits and costs that would accrue to the Council and public services in the borough
• The future structure, shape and size of the council
• The role, structure, shape and size of the capacity vehicle
• The potential configuration of future services
• The change programme required to deliver the benefits of the model.

9.9.2 The key elements of this phase of work should be:

• Deepening of current arrangements for joint commissioning with public sector partners and an assessment of the potential for further development of this pan-public sector activity
• Development of proposals with potential private, public and voluntary sector partners in a capacity vehicle, including a detailed assessment of costs and potential savings, and when they would accrue
• Development of proposals with potential private, public and voluntary sector partners for the re-configuration of services in the borough, including a detailed assessment of costs and potential savings, and when they would accrue
• Significant input from Council staff into the development of proposals.

9.9.3 The cost of the next phase of the programme will be £250,000, as set out in the table below.

Dec 08-June09
Staff costs £140,000
Communication and engagement £30,000
External advice £70,000
Programme costs £10,000
Total £250,000

Significant input from Council staff into the development of proposals. Mr Mustard hasn't noticed this in any report he has ever read.

Mr Mustard will bring you the highlights of the 6 July 2009 report soon.

Yours frugally
Mr Mustard