Showing posts with label shambles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shambles. Show all posts

3 December 2018

Bin there, not done that


For the last week Mr Mustard has been trying to get Barnet Council's twitter account to tell him how many bin lorries there are. The unwritten but self evident ethos of the twitter account is that Barnet Council only ever tweet good news. Consequently, it is to be inferred that the council have an inadequate number of bin lorries. That is a question which may get answered later but Mr Mustard wants to get on and blog about bins, although bingate may go on for some time, despite what the vlogger Richard Cornelius had to say on youtube.
Mr Mustard does like to get his facts right but if Barnet Council want to treat a simple statistic such as the number of bin lorries as a matter of state secrecy he will just have to estimate as best he can. A bin man (not ruling this out as a career choice for ladies but don't believe there are any currently acting as loaders or drivers) will possibly confirm the facts in the comments box below.

The correspondence with the Mayor of London included the statistic that 12 loaders could be saved who dealt with the food waste bins, one for each bin round, so we have 12 lorries for black bin collection (some bins have become grey with old age). The latest reorganisation, or shambles as it is known in homes across Barnet, elicited the additional fact that blue bin recycling rounds and black bin rounds are the same, so there must be 12 lorries for blue bin collection. It isn't so much the number of lorries as spare ones will be needed to cover for breakdowns, servicing and accidents etc. as the number of collection rounds which is important. 

Now to Mr Mustard's reckoning as to why the new system isn't working and will never work 100%.

If the above numbers are correct each crew is expected to collect:

359,000 bins a week, as per Richard above, which divided by 5 days

= 72,000 bins a day, which divided by 24 lorries

= 3,000 bins a day per team (lorry) with 2 loading

= 1,500 bins per person, who usually does 2 bins at a time (if the street layout permits)
= 750 repetitions in 7.5 hours

= 100 reps an hour or a pair of bins being rounded up, moved, tipped and returned to the property/pavement

A pair of bins being tipped every 36 seconds.

That does not look possible. The team I saw this week had a driver + 2 and more staff doesn't make much sense as only 2 bins can be tipped at the same time so you have two on the lorry with 2 more being picked up / returned at the same time.

Of course not all bins are put out every week but still, to expect that many collections day in and day out will lead to binman burnout.

Please rubbish my figures if they are wrong.

The article from Barnet First claism the changes are to make the service more efficient (not happened) effective (not happened) and economical (not happened either due to up to £20,000 a week of extra costs being incurred for 98% of a service).

Mr Mustard thinks, and the budget cuts dictate, that the changes were motivated entirely by the need to save money but the budget has been cut at the same time as the number of proeprties in barnet has increased. You can only ever stretch an elastic band so far before it breaks and that is the point we have reached with bins.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

18 January 2013

Festive refunds - thank you Mr Reasonable


Barnet Council once again excelled themselves in December when the awfully mean 2 hour free parking that was offered during the weekend of 22/23 December (and the 23rd was a Sunday when parking charges are rarely due) was not sufficiently advertised and motorists stumped up £9,000 in error.

This problem was picked up by the ever vigilante Mr Reasonable who cleverly asked a Freedom of Information question ( the same question would have been deemed vexatious if Mr Mustard had asked it ) to find out the extent of the fiasco which you can read about here.

In the local Barnet Times newspaper today, on page 2, you can read an article headed "Refunds over festive parking confusion" where confusion means "complete and utter shambles" and we are asked to believe that the council spotted this problem on the day and ordered immediate refunds. What they didn't order was Verrus, who run the hated pay-by-phone system, to stop taking money in and so now we have the council making 5,200 refunds when they could have stopped the payments coming in at all.

If you paid for parking on 22 or 23 December and have not been automatically refunded for the first 2 hours which were free, send an email to parking.clientteam@barnet.gov.uk and get your money back. 

If you received a parking ticket and had parked for less than 2 hours (which the council can't prove one way or the other as they only observe for a minute or two) then you are equally due a refund if you have paid. Apply for one, or for unpaid parking tickets send in an appeal, at barnet@nslservices.co.uk and send a copy to parking.clientteam@barnet.gov.uk to make sure the message gets through. Give them the parking ticket number (usually starts with AG) your vehicle registration and your name and address and the amount you would like to be refunded.

Have fun.

Please let Mr Mustard know (mrmustard@zoho.com ) if you hadn't been automatically refunded or if you encounter any problems with the council.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard 

25 October 2012

Appeal success figures crash


Readers may recall that Mr Mustard wrote about the fact that many appeals being taken to the third and final stage, an appeal to PATAS, were not being properly followed through. See this post from July.

Now we are only a week away from being 6 months into the contract with NSL and the teething troubles excuse is well and truly worn out. There is now no excuse for a parking firm not to be fully up to speed.

London Councils who run PATAS have put out the statistics for the year ended 31 March 2012, which you can find here. Ignore the spin about tickets being looked at more closely; the independent adjudicators make findings of fact.

Picking up the general figures first: 30,865 parking tickets cancelled out of 64,903 requests equals 48% cancelled.

Barnet's share of those were 841 parking tickets cancelled out of 1,322 requests which equals 64% cancelled. Barnet fared rather badly in the league table of London Boroughs. Only Tower Hamlets and Redbridge had marginally worse results. This suggests that Barnet have been following too mean a policy which we have certainly seen evidenced.

Since NSL took over the results have been in free fall. Here they are in a handy weekly digest.

Week Motorist Council
Starting won won
2 May 34 3
7 May 102 1
14 May 34 2
21 May 55 1
28 May 70 0
4 June 2 0
11 June 43 7
18 June 24 8
25 June 17 6
2 July 12 7
9 July 13 1
16 Jul 14 9
23 Jul 11 4
30 Jul 1 5
06 Aug 8 8
13 Aug 22 6
20 Aug 8 4
27 Aug 15 1
03 Sep 9 3
10 Sep 15 3
17 Sep 22 6
24 Sep 21 7
01 Oct 17 6
08 Oct 23 6
15 Oct 51 13
since NSL 406 36
Percentages 92% 8%

So the 64% has slipped to 92%. It makes Mr Mustard wonder if NSL management have simply decided not to bother about cases going to PATAS as they take up a lot of time and need someone who really understands parking to handle them and having got rid of the entire back office they are at somewhat of a loss?

What has this cost Barnet Council? The average parking ticket is worth £98. The cost of a PATAS appeal for Barnet Council is £46.73 so every PATAS loss costs £144.73

28% more of the cases than before the contract started are now being lost which so far in almost 6 months is 442 times 0.28 = 124 extra lost cases. At £144.73 a time that is £64,000 (to the nearest thousand) or £128,000 in a full year.

Wasn't this One Barnet contract going to save us £600,000 a year. It doesn't seem very likely to happen, now does it?

Mr Mustard does hope that these losses are being clawed back from NSL. When the next annual audit comes around Mr Mustard will be at the North London Business Park asking the difficult questions on behalf of all residents.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard

13 December 2011

The Agilisys contract - over £500,000

Here is the DPR which set Barnet Council down the path of using Agilisys and Impower (directors now include Max Wide) as the One Barnet overlords - Mr Mustard can't actually work out who is in charge of One Barnet - anyone want to tell him if it is the leader (the small L is deliberate), non-stick Nick Walkley the Chief Executive - too pre-occupied with the car park surely to have time for One Barnet? - or the consultants who stand to make a bundle (collective noun for a set of services to be outsourced?) 

DPR 1134 One Barnet Implementation

and the cost of this contract?

5.3 The cost of the Implementation Partner contract is assessed to be in excess of £500,000

This DPR has the name of Councillor Thomas on it as well as being the product of Craig Cooper. What do you suppose "in excess of £500,000 means?" £600k, £700k but certainly less than a million?

Here is what has been bunged at Agilisys and Impower ( all Impower payments go to Agilisys ) from 5 August 2010 to 31 October 2011 i.e. in 15 months.


Service Area Type Date Ref. £
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300520 8,244.50
Children's Service Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300525 3,980.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300530 10,800.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300531 43,152.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300536 14,550.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300539 33,050.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300541 34,057.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300544 17,891.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300545 5,149.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300546 7,350.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300549 10,450.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 05/04/2011 5000300550 6,750.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304891 837.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304890 1,144.50
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304893 1,225.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304902 1,350.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304892 5,282.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304908 7,250.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304900 10,599.00
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304909 11,836.50
Commercial Directorate One Barnet 20/05/2011 5000304894 21,303.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 30/06/2011 5000309458 35,114.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/06/2011 5000309170 22,918.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/06/2011 5000309171 5,500.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/06/2011 5000309166 3,537.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/06/2011 5000309167 2,362.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 04/07/2011 5000309635 18,078.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 04/07/2011 5000309636 14,193.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/07/2011 5000312468 5,400.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 04/07/2011 5000309638 4,151.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/08/2011 5000314087 29,812.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/08/2011 5000314088 25,970.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 10/08/2011 5000314003 23,537.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/08/2011 5000314068 19,080.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/08/2011 5000314094 10,326.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 10/08/2011 5000314006 4,380.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/08/2011 5000314090 3,249.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/08/2011 5000314097 712.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 16/09/2011 5000317667 8,579.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 16/09/2011 5000317668 20,762.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 16/09/2011 5000317669 27,821.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 16/09/2011 5000317670 3,298.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 23/09/2011 5000318408 17,632.00
Corporate Governance Consult Fees 19/09/2011 5000317785 6,200.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 31/10/2011 5000322323 47,543.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 17/10/2011 5000320850 28,500.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 21/10/2011 5000321596 26,750.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 13/10/2011 5000320638 24,957.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 31/10/2011 5000322315 19,413.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 18/10/2011 5000321041 14,137.20
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/10/2011 5000320433 13,661.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 18/10/2011 5000321038 12,347.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 31/10/2011 5000322316 11,998.50
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 17/10/2011 5000320854 9,727.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 11/10/2011 5000320436 2,375.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 31/10/2011 5000322318 1,700.00
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 13/10/2011 5000320636 962.50
Planning, Housing & Regeneration Consult Fees 14/09/2010 5000272478 57,068
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289778 15,384
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289778 15,384
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289779 23,548
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289783 6,147
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289786 4,025
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289788 2,240
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/02/2011 5000289788 2,240
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294012 -6,500
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294013 -102,860
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294231 19,900
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294232 6,500
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294236 102,860
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294238 93,250
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294240 15,050
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294245 11,940
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294246 11,975
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294248 14,940
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294272 30,425
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294275 187,150
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294276 27,600
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294279 53,125
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 01/03/2011 5000294301 91,050
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294465 -93,250
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294467 -15,050
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294468 -30,425
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294469 -187,150
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294471 -27,600
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294472 -53,125
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294473 -91,050
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294474 -19,900
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294475 -11,940
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294476 -11,975
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294479 -14,940
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294495 5,775
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294498 700
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294517 15,395
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294520 1,700
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294521 10,602
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294528 14,581
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294529 2,375
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294531 32,970
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294534 4,280
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294538 11,975
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294539 11,940
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294541 18,008
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294542 11,979
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294569 12,882
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294571 14,364
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294577 10,314
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294580 6,475
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294584 8,425
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294594 13,890
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/03/2011 5000294609 4,480
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 03/03/2011 5000294758 2,187
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 18/03/2011 5000297080 32,970
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 18/03/2011 5000297080 10,602
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 18/03/2011 5000297083 2,187
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 22/03/2011 5000297453 -2,187
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/03/2011 5000298863 -10,602
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 28/03/2011 5000298863 -32,970
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/12/2010 5000282907 19,900
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/12/2010 5000282909 10,292
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/12/2010 5000282910 77,175
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/12/2010 5000282913 24,523
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/12/2010 5000282914 43,450
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 02/12/2010 5000282919 16,448
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 23/12/2010 5000285770 32,146
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 23/12/2010 5000285771 30,109
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 23/12/2010 5000285774 21,916
Commercial Directorate Consult Fees 23/12/2010 5000285778 24,760

Total

1,424,988.84

So only 15 months in, still another 21 to suffer, and the pig nuts are rattling into the trough at the rate of £95,000 worth a month. The cost has blasted past a mere £500,000

Given that Craig Cooper the £132,480 a year Director of non-Commercial Services also wrote this:

3.3 Procurement and contracting skills: Poor procurement and contracting skills as well as leadership capacity constraints in the Council could limit the ability to obtain the desired efficiencies and service improvements. Key future shape activities would include focused work to develop the Council’s contracting and procurement expertise as well as the development and implementation of a public sector leadership development programme directly to address and mitigate these risks.

The bloggers have been banging on about poor procurement skills all year. MetPro for one back in March, some 8 months after poor procurement was identified as a problem by you and a key future shape activity. So then 12+ months and over 2 million quid later along comes RM Countryside who have been engaged in questionable circumstances during the last 6 years. So much for Cllr Thomas holding you to account Captain Cooper.

Mr Mustard thinks that Cllr Thomas works for a building society. If you were self building a house and told him you needed to borrow £500,000 and then got half built and had already spent £1.4m do you suppose he would find it acceptable? Perfectly acceptable for this sort of spend though inside Barnet Council.

How long will it be before procurement is properly managed?

See you in 2012 for yet another tale of woe about procurement.

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard