Redbridge Council - boxes its own ears

Mr Mustard's ears prick up when he sees a Council v Council entry on the tribunal website and he asks the council for all the paperwork behind the PCN. He doesn't always get it all but he gets enough to show the idiocy of the PCN system. In this case the council didn't fight the tribunal Appeal which it started against itself.

Here is the PCN.

There is no profit to be had from this PCN, it is simply a case of moving money from one council budget to another one, or not.

 

Mr Mustard didn't get a copy of the representations which were supposedly exempt but it doesn't really matter, they won't have been that radical.

Mr Mustard did get the video and here it is.

 

He was sent the rejection notice.

The rejection is a dismal piece of work because what you can't see in the video is the exit of the box so no-one knows why the vehicle stopped and the reason has to be because of stationary vehicles, what vehicles? There aren't any in shot. Adjudicators cancel PCNs for this reason all the time.

Mr Mustard went up and down Ley Street on google. It is rather long. Mr Mustard only found one yellow box, viz:

Where is this? It is at the entrance to the council depot. Mr Mustard wonders if the necessary steps were followed before the council painted a box intended to aid their workers but which they now use to penalise their workers? Laurel and Hardy have some competition it seems.

Mr Mustard did ask if the camera had been adjusted to better show the box and the answer was that it had.

Mr Mustard also asked how many PCNs the council had issued to itself in the year ended 31 March 2023. The answer was 107.

Mr Mustard also asked if the motorists caught in that box, which was inadequately covered by camera, would be refunded and of course the answer was 'no'.

There is little honour in Redbridge.

The end.

In Procurement any old supplier will do.

Mr Mustard is something of an expert in the solvency arena having worked for a quarter of a century in credit control of one sort or another. Prior to that he had been the manager of the purchase ledger for a chain of private hospitals. As important as ensuring that your customers can pay you is that your suppliers will be around in the future to support you. Barnet Council have a set of rules to ensure that suppliers are solvent and monitored; they would seem to have failed.

Who prepared the graphic designs for the new website ( expected on 30 March but doubtless it will be late in arriving ) and were paid £15,000 in September 2011? The firm of CDT Design Ltd. Who has just gone into liquidation and so won't be around to make any amendments? yes, CDT Design Ltd in liquidation.

Just look at the figures:

Cdt Design Liquidation

Well, CDT Design were in a pretty bad way then, weren't they? They haven't paid their PAYE (sounds like Barnet Council who regard it as option for interims) or their VAT. They were also insolvent to the tune of £371,463 not what one would call an insignificant sum. 

Now could Barnet Council have known about the parlous state of the finances of CDT Design? Yes, of course they could. They subscribe to Experian, one of the largest sources of financial information in the land and it is a minutes work to download from Companies House as Mr Mustard has done.

CDT Design Ltd Accounts to 31 March 2010

So what we can see from the accounts to 31 March 2010, which were filed in September 2010 is that the company had borderline solvency.

Thus it was that Barnet Council employed them in 2011 and paid them as follows :

What	Who	Date	Ref	Value £
Equip-Mats-Purc-Rep	CDT Design Ltd	06/04/2011	5000300950	4,015.00
Equip-Mats-Purc-Rep	CDT Design Ltd	06/04/2011	5000300952	4,015.00
Equip-Mats-Purc-Rep	CDT Design Ltd	06/04/2011	5000300954	1,275.00
Equip-Mats-Purc-Rep	CDT Design Ltd	06/04/2011	5000300954	1,237.50
Equip-Mats-Purc-Rep	CDT Design Ltd	06/04/2011	5000300954	1,237.50
Consult Fees	CDT Design Ltd	19/04/2011	5000302268	840.00
Consult Fees	CDT Design Ltd	19/04/2011	5000302269	2,340.00
Consult Fees	CDT Design Ltd	04/07/2011	5000309677	3,750.00
Equip-Mats-Purc-Rep	CDT Design Ltd	23/08/2011	5000315427	1,450.00

In addition Mr Mustard has an FOI response which says that CDT were paid £15,000 in September 2011.

So which officer is responsible for Information Systems? It is ultimately Crapitain Craig Cooper, the Commercial Director, who is paid £132,480 p.a. and who is responsible for procurement and for adherence to the council's rules on purchasing and the vetting of suppliers, yes, it is Craig Cooper, the Commercial Director on £132,480 p.a.

Would it be too kind to use the description "inept"?

Yours frugally

Mr Mustard