It seems that the council didn't think to include photographs for the adjudicator of the wider context which per google street view, is as below:
If the council wish to treat this as a footpath then they need to add at a gate at this end to match the one at the other end:
You might think that it was a bold move to drive into there but if you look back at the first photograph there is a cul de sac sign which informs drivers that they won't be able to go far but does not ban entry and there is nothing which prohibits parking.
A PCN was not the solution to the perceived problem.
Indeed the presence of the cul-de-sac sign lends further weight to the proposition that the area concerned is a road, given that in the gov.uk publication ‘know your road signs’ it is described - correctly - as a sign indicating ‘no through road’!
ReplyDelete