Mr Mustard drafted a complaint for Tristan to send, it got over-looked at the time but finally got sent on Sunday afternoon. Mr Mustard doesn't mess about, complaints about laws not followed should be sent to the Monitoring Officer:
Ms Langley was quick to respond to her email, wrote back very quickly (Monday morning at 9.09) in a friendly and open way and although Mr Mustard hasn't given you the numbers her email footer includes both a landline number and a mobile. That is rarely the case in Barnet Council where staff don't want the public to be able to phone them up or often to even email them. Public accountability should include multiple easy contact methods. Well done Cornwall Council.
The council get a pat on the back for admitting there were 9 other similar cases of which 4 had been paid and those motorists are going to get a pleasant surprise, a refund for monies they paid which were not legally due. Cornwall Council's reputation will be enhanced by their behaviour.
The apology feels sincere and there will be no need to go to stage 2.
There is however one odd fact about this, Mr Mustard himself sent a Freedom of Information request to Cornwall Council in April, which they answered quite quickly (so another bonus point) as follows:
The bonus point is somewhat wiped out by the minus 10 for a wrong answer.
The question should have rung an alarm bell. Ask yourself, FOI officers, why someone is asking a question that is so precise, it was in this case because Mr Mustard knew the answer was at least one occasion and probably more.
Mr Mustard hopes that the council are now checking all deadlines which apply to PCN processing and adapting their software to make sure they are all respected.
Yours frugally
Mr Mustard
One has to wonder how many other councils are also sending out NtOs out-of-time, and also, of course, bus lane PCNs which must be sent within 28 days. I suspect that if they knew they'd be up in court for acting unlawfully, there would be far less of this illegal practice.
ReplyDeleteThis is a slight improvement on my interaction with them several years ago when a bailiff employed by them clamped my disabled friend's car despite both Blue Badge and nil tax rate and threatened to tow it. Their response to our complaint was:
ReplyDelete1. The actions of the bailiff is unfortunately not something in which the Council can investigate.
2. . The warrant need not be in the address in which the person is living at as the outstanding debt is outstanding to the person and not the property.
3. Unfortunately I cannot comment on their actions as this is not something that the Council has any involvement in. If you wish to complain about the actions of the bailiff you would need to make contact with the company directly and pass this complaint through their internal complaints procedure.
We got the money paid to the bailiff back via TPT but the LGO saw no cause for complaint.........