Once Mr Mustard found out about the warning circular sent by London Councils, some questions came to his mind. Here they are along with the answers.
3. Similarly to the anonymous employee who was over-using his/her initiative Mr Mustard thinks that the circular that was sent breached his expectation that the circular would not have been sent and his name effectively disclosed.
4. No point in having in-house FOI experts if you don't ask them the necessary questions at the material time.
5. There was no need to do anything other than respond to the enquiries actually made.
6. So the circular that was sent should never have been sent as providing advice on FOI is not part of the remit of London Councils. All London boroughs have their own experts or access to them.
7. In short, Yes.
8. Very odd that different boroughs sent Mr Mustard minutes with different dates, none of which were correct.
9. London Councils were blind.
11. Oh no, no copyright in the minutes and yet the following bodies told Mr Mustard there was so he could not have them.
Ealing Council, Enfield Council, Harrow Council, Hounslow Council, Lambeth Council, Lewisham Council, Newham Council, Sutton Council, Waltham Forest Council & Wandsworth Council.
What a shocking lack of knowledge of FOI and Copyright.
13. There was discussion of the subject of minutes and copyright though. The next set of minutes will be interesting. Want to bet that they are even briefer now?
Parking departments can run from Mr Mustard but they can't hide.
Yours frugally
Mr Mustard
No comments:
Post a Comment
I now moderate comments in the light of the Delfi case. Due to the current high incidence of spam I have had to turn word verification on.