The following email has just gone out to everyone on a council email database (probably gleaned from resident permit applications) which will be a separate story about a data breach in due course.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Barnet Council is currently consulting on introducing a schools parking permit scheme to help schools within the borough attract and retain staff. We would like to hear from you on the council’s proposals so please inform tell your school staff, parents and residents that this consultation is underway.
Reasons why the scheme is being proposed:
Barnet schools currently face a number of issues with the recruitment and retention of staff such as:
• we border inner London boroughs that offer higher weighting salaries
• neighbouring boroughs offer more help with housing and travel currently
• some neighbouring boroughs already offer schools parking permits
.
Proposed parking permit overview.
The scheme the council is proposing would:
• seek to ensure residents can park as near to their home as possible by offering a maximum number of permits to a school based on the availability of parking spaces
• allow schools to determine which staff receives those parking permits
• Only allow schools that have a school travel plan in place to take part in the scheme.
Summary of proposed scheme
If a schools parking permit scheme was introduced it would allow schools that reside in a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) to offer parking permits to their staff.
The individual permits would only be valid:
• in particular streets and only where suitable capacity is available
• during term time
• Monday to Friday
To take part in the scheme the school would need to have a school travel plan in place.
To take part in the consultation visit:
The consultation is titled Barnet Council’s Schools Parking Permit Consultation and closes on 30 September 2015.
Barnet Council Schools Permit Consultation
Commissioning Group
Mr Mustard was aware that this consultation was coming as he was at the relevant committee meeting and this is what he said at it on this topic alone:
Thirdly, permits for school staff.
I am all in favour of maximising the usage of on-street car parking spaces. Adjacent to Ravenscroft Park in High Barnet there is 200m of residents parking which sits empty all day as houses are only on one side of the road. It could also offer free parking in the afternoons the same as on Hadley Common.
However, the idea of letting school staff (park) is one that needs to be treated with caution as even private profit making schools appear to be included. So a school employee could have a permit which would cost, I presume, the same amount as a resident's permit (with £40 being typical) but an employee of, say, a school stationery supplier, which might be in an adjacent building, would have to pay £525
I feel a judicial review coming on if you treat one group of employees more favourably the another.
Thank you.
I am all in favour of maximising the usage of on-street car parking spaces. Adjacent to Ravenscroft Park in High Barnet there is 200m of residents parking which sits empty all day as houses are only on one side of the road. It could also offer free parking in the afternoons the same as on Hadley Common.
However, the idea of letting school staff (park) is one that needs to be treated with caution as even private profit making schools appear to be included. So a school employee could have a permit which would cost, I presume, the same amount as a resident's permit (with £40 being typical) but an employee of, say, a school stationery supplier, which might be in an adjacent building, would have to pay £525
I feel a judicial review coming on if you treat one group of employees more favourably the another.
Thank you.
and this is what a local business has to say on the matter:
Giving teachers permits would be
absurd and completely to the detriment of the local economy. But then Barnet
does not care for the local economy – it is something to be mined and exploited
until it collapses.
Teachers are a net drain on the
local economy. They tend to live outside the borough (if they did not then why
permits?) and thus draw their salaries locally and spend them elsewhere.
Parking is a very scarce
resource. Our local economy depends on shoppers to be able to park and to that
end we have fought hard to re-align the parking in High Barnet and contain
commuters to Fitzjohn Avenue car park. To fill the remaining places with
teachers' cars would be an economic disaster. They say that it would only be
allowed in designated CPZ areas but by doing that existing parking in those
areas will be displaced. Many visitors to the High Street use the side streets
as they simply will not embrace the current parking regime.
What makes teachers a special
case? It would seem we cannot recruit into many areas of employment. What about
doctors and nurses? And, hey, shop workers! In Maslow's hierarchy of needs
education is way below food (but probably not sweets). We have to pay £525 for
the privilege of parking our van that serves the people of Barnet. I rather
think that WE should be given free permits!
All other occupations depend on
employees commuting when they cannot employ from the local community. You have
to ask why is this ‘perk’ necessary in the case of teachers. If their package
is not attractive you have to look at remuneration. To take a resource
from somewhere else and give it away as a cheap (free as far as the council is
concerned) solution is not the way to do things. The economic cost is simply
being displaced – residents and businesses will bear the cost.
To argue that some other
councils have implemented this ill-conceived policy as a reason for doing it in
Barnet is simply a ridiculous argument – just because someone does something
does not make it right.
This is positive discrimination
towards one group (with delusions of grandeur) at the detriment of another
group which is actually funding the economy.
If you don't want your road, near to a school, over-run with teachers' cars so that you can't get parked in the day, then you know what to do, complete the survey.
If, like Mr Mustard, you don't want your data going onto SurveyMonkey's US server then email Paul.Millard@Barnet.gov.uk for a paper copy to complete. Although you have until 30 September to get it in, the best day to act is today.
Yours frugally
Mr Mustard
No comments:
Post a Comment
I now moderate comments in the light of the Delfi case. Due to the current high incidence of spam I have had to turn word verification on.