At the Barnet Council Audit Committee on 1
May the external auditor from BDO made some very worrying and serious
statements about the controls systems in place. This follows a £2 million fraud
last year, and pervasive problems with the pensions and payroll administration.
“You don’t have a particularly strong
control environment”, the auditor reported, and then stated that Capita were
“not minded” to provide assurance over systems running processes on Barnet
Council’s behalf.
This is an astonishing response from Capita.
Responsibility for assurance of these
systems, run from Capita’s offices around the United Kingdom, falls to Barnet
Council’s Internal Audit Team.
As the External Auditor made clear, the
Internal Audit team is doing good work “but it doesn’t give you that level of
assurance that you would expect with so much of the service outsourced”.
Given that Capita provide so many of
Barnet’s back office systems this is a very serious situation, especially as
the external auditor raised this problem two years ago, before the £2 million
fraud was discovered.
As bloggers who have closely followed and
reported the story of Barnet’s partnership with Capita, we are deeply concerned
about this situation and alarmed that neither the auditor nor committee members
were aware that assurance of Capita’s systems is a contractual requirement, and
not something that could be provided at their discretion.
We ask the following questions of the
Council:
·
Why were the audit committee not made aware of
the auditor’s concerns when they were raised two years ago?
·
Why are Capita “not minded” to provide
assurance over their systems when the contract appears to indicate that they
must provide that assurance?
·
Why did Grant Thornton not pick this matter up
when they were the Council’s External Auditors or as part of their contract
review following the fraud?
·
Why have the Council’s contract monitoring
officers not identified this problem before now?
·
If BDO are saying the Council does not have a
strong control environment, what are the risks of another fraud or systems
failure happening?
And finally,
·
How can Capita continue to retain the
confidence of the Council without such assurances?
We ask that the Council arranges for a
forensic review/audit of both Capita contracts to address the contractual
failures raised by the External Auditor as a matter of the utmost urgency, to
be paid for by Capita, before any further decisions are made on what services
Capita will continue to provide. Failure to do so can only have the most
serious consequences for the financial security of this borough, and the well
being of all residents.
Signed:
Derek Dishman
John Dix
Theresa Musgrove
Roger Tichborne
No comments:
Post a Comment
I now moderate comments in the light of the Delfi case. Due to the current high incidence of spam I have had to turn word verification on.